Forward and Backward with Steve Clemons’

I have been a long time follower of Steve Clemons’ political blog at  I have often found his take on many important national & world issues to be progressive, moderate, and often pragmatic … all of which seem to be increasingly rare these days in a hyper-partisan climate which seems to dominate our collective psyche.

I consider myself to be politically moderate in most instances; however, I generally lean toward the liberal end of the spectrum on social issues, but am financially conservative.   I suppose could even go so far as to say I have been a moderate Libertarian on many fronts prior to the so-called Tea Party movement, yet I recognize the need for sufficiency of governmental infrastructure.  In other words, I am not a proponent of fundamental Libertarianism … as I believe the logical end game is anarchy and lack of a “core safety-net foundation” (i.e. fire, police, hospitals) if practiced in the extreme/purist form.

In any case, I believe I started following Steve Clemons’ blog after the recess appointment of John Bolton as the United States Ambassador to the United Nations … since Mr. Clemons seemed to really be a force to reckon with in so far as uncovering some of more blatant as well as the more nuanced consequences of Bolton’s appointment and how it affected the United States’ credibility in the court of world opinion.    I owe a great deal of credit to Steve for truly captivating my attention to that particular issue as well as many others which he explored over the course of blogging at — which has since been a “regular stop” for me in so far as news/op-ed sources I frequent to keep abreast of political news/events.

While I’m sure there are plenty issues I might disagree with Steve, one of the “biggies” is with respect to “Net Neutrality”.  I don’t want to put words into his mouth, but I believe he was at one point officially on the fence regarding this issue; however, I believe he may have given some consideration to the support of some form of an abolishment of the current status quo of net neutrality in favor of a “pay to serve faster (content)” paradigm in effort to ramp up our national IT/internet infrastructure via privatization (to paraphrase).

I believe net neutrality is a critical leveling mechanism with respect to how “the news” affects political discourse in so far as opening up the number of potential “channels” which the world’s population is able to viably select to garner meaningful and often times diverse perspectives on a wide range of issues.  Net neutrality represents the polar opposite of the consolidation of news sources which tend to homogenize perspective and discourse.   Moreover, it is a lot easier for political players to “steer the masses” with fewer news sources.  This is one of the more significant pitfalls I am concerned about … especially since a neutral internet allows for independent writers to gain immediate equality with what has traditionally been a high barrier of entry, a good ole boys club if you will, to mass dispersal of information without the contamination of the particular agendas of special interests which seems to currently enjoy an institutional bias on this front.  The potential of the independent writer must not be curtailed if we are to advance and evolve to allow each of our voices to be potentially heard by the world’s ear.

OK, back to the point of this post:  I had not seen a post by Steve on in over two weeks (July 14, 2011) … so I opted to visit his relatively new home at and found there to be about 18 posts which had never appeared on  There are truly a gazillion possibilities why this is the case … many of which might be very good reasons.   I realize it’s obviously not up to me to dictate where Steve publishes his writings, and maybe there are many significant “upsides” to joining forces with a larger entity; however, the one  downside I can’t help but consider to be a trump card is the apparent shift away from what appeared to be a more independent platform.   This is certainly not to say is not a great venue in it’s own right.

Again, I’m not privy to the details behind the scenes and whether this is a temporary phase, transitional, or more permanent move?   Personally, I hope Steve keeps his bet hedged and realizes the enormous impact he’s had on the political blogging sphere as well as the example has provided in so far as illustrating what IS POSSIBLE for any person to potentially emulate to some degree.  Granted Steve has been involved in politics for a while & presumably has many “inside connections” – which might give him a leg up over an “average American” – but he has still provided a working example of how one person’s voice can be heard on the national/world stage and have an impact.

“This is correct, this is the natural state of things,” he said after he had smashed a 10 year old record to become the first man to rush for over 2000 yards in a single NFL season.OJ Simpson in a recent photo provided by the Nevada Department of Cheap NFL Jerseys Corrections. Photo/APAfter he accomplishes that feat we see him in a post match interview, bringing his teammates into the cheap jerseys wholesale room and naming each one for the camera. Because nfl jerseys china of the issues I just cited, along with many others, more than half of those approaching retirement fear that they will run out of money. Because of this we have a record number of people in this country working into their 70s. There are also more people than ever before that have cut their expenses to the bone, moved in with their children, or have sold their home and moved into a low cost apartment just so they are sure they won’t run out of money.16. St. Louis Rams: Cordarrelle Patterson, WR, Tennessee, Junior: With the first of two first round selections the Rams make sure they get the best offensive weapon available in Cordarrelle Patterson. While he has his issues, his physical skills are remarkable and would provide Sam Bradford with a legit big play weapon.Predeceased near the Cheap NFL Jerseys dog pop, Charles rob Noseworthy. Getting timberland outlet out of inthat would mourn, The size of it 4 little: Bill Charles Noseworthy, Philip Matthew Noseworthy, Stacey maggie Noseworthy(Dave Davis), Bruce Dane Noseworthy not to timberland outlet store mention his or her timberland outlet wholesale jerseys china mummy, Janice Doiron; Their particular mummy, Wholesale Jerseys Florencia Noseworthy; Grandkids: Religious beliefs O Lauren Noseworthy additionally Brianna Noseworthy; timberland boots Bros: timberland boots Phyllis Noseworthy(Humble Vokey), Rob Noseworthy(Claudette), Debbie Chafe(Hubert), Charlotte now Noseworthy(Robert Yetman), Jacqueline Fleming(David), Georgina Cheap Jerseys Strugnell(Doug Strugnell), Denise Noseworthy(Jeff new balance 574 Malone), Deanne Tucker(Henry Tucker); Really fantastic buddys: Bev fitzgibbons, Adam O Patricia Morris; In addition to a many new balance outlet of the new balance trainers nieces, Nephews, Aunties, Uncles, And so companions. Ghd straighteners Buckner the north face bottes ugg pas cher a true religion jeans woman uggs of hermes pas cher character, nike air max uk a sac hermes member north face of louboutin shoes Society christian louboutin in rolex replica a louboutin large longchamp pas cher Middle Western uggs canada city oakley sunglasses wholesale burberry sale carrying ugg a lululemon outlet online pitcher air max of instyler ionic styler fruit michael kors lemonade nike roshe through baseball bats her jordan shoes own louis vuitton handbags spacious new balance outlet back karen millen yard, asics shoes was the north face progressing louboutin outlet across michael kors handbags a michael kors outlet hundred discount oakley sunglasses years.